English 850S/Composition Theory and Practice.

Sandra Jamieson--Spring 2003
.


Class will meet: Mondays 7:00-9:30 in Embury 205. Format: Seminar .
My office: SWBowne 118. Office hours: Tuesdays 2-6, & by appt.
Phone #: Office:(973) 408-3499. Home:(908) 757-1051 (between 10am & 10pm only!)
Email:Office:sjamieso@drew.edu.
Homepage:http://www.users.drew.edu/~sjamieso/

Course description  (Follow this link)
Texts(Follow this link)
Writing Assignments, etc.  (Follow this link)


Syllabus

(Click on the date to see what we'll be doing in class that day):


January 27 February 3 February 10 February 17
February 24  March 3 March 10 March 17
March 24 March 31  April 7-snow date  April 14 - snow revised
April 21 April 28-snow revised May 5-snow revised "World lecture hall"


Prior to the first class please do the following:
  • Purchase the books.  (If you join the National Council of Teachers of English [NCTE], you can purchase books published by them for a significant discount and also receive two journals, College Composition and Communication (CCC) and College English (predominantly literature).  Check out the website at <http://www.ncte.org>
  • The Personal literacy narrative is often assigned at the beginning of first year writing classes as a way for the teacher to get to know the students and also as an invitation to the students to think of themselves as writers and to consider the factors that helped to form their academic self-image. To begin this course, I'd like you to write your own literacy narratives, for the same reasons and also as a first step in your process of imagining yourselves as teachers.  Think about your history as a writer, reader, and thinker.  The guidelines below come directly from an undergraduate writing syllabus (ENGL A2E).

  • (1) As a generative process:  Write out answers to any of the following questions that seem relevant (but consider all of them): when did you learn to write?  who taught you?  when did you learn to read?  who taught you?  how did you feel about reading and writing?  how much do you remember family members reading and writing as you were growing up?  how much do you remember them encouraging (or discouraging) your reading and writing?  what role did school play in your developing literacy? teachers? friends? members of your community, church, extended family, etc.? what setbacks did you encounter? what encouragements? who or what has been the single most important influence on your literacy so far? what is your favorite book? why? who is your favorite book character? why? what advice about writing and reading would you give to a young writer? a writing teacher? the parent of a young child?  Feel free to expand on any of these questions and write about anything else that seems relevant. 
    (2) As a reflexive process: Look over your answers paying attention to patterns and connections, and use them to help you organize your narrative.  You may find it most helpful to structure the paper thematically, focusing on specific topics (such as good reading experiences, influential people, bad experiences, etc.), or you may prefer to write your narrative chronologically, describing your evolving literacy over your lifetime.  Use whichever structure most makes sense to you (And, yes, you can use "I" and "me" to write about yourself!)
    (3) Please bring this to class on January 27 and be prepared to discuss it with your classmates (you will not be asked to read it or share it with anyone aside form me).





January 27 (Mon): Introduction: to the course, the texts, and each other. Teaching as a reflexive practice:  the role of story, the art of listening, the act of repeating, the process of evaluating, the politics of revising. 
  • Course Theme I:  Imagining writers :  Discussion of class members' literacy narratives and the process of writing them.  I will share (with their permission--although names have been changed) some responses to the above prompt written by pre-college level students.  How would you respond to them?  Spend 10-20 minutes writing responses to these students.  We will discuss these narratives and your responses.  What can this teach us as teachers? 
  • Courses Theme II:  Imagining ourselves as teachers:  As the course moves forward I would like you to build on your literacy narrative by considering how your attitudes about literacy change (or remain the same) in response to the readings and discussions in this class, and to your experiences teaching or tutoring if you are currently engaged in either of these activities.  As a first step, we will write in class in response to the following prompt:  Describe the teacher who had the greatest impact on you. What did he or she teach you about teaching? How has this person influenced your ideas about teaching and learning? 
Sign up for presentations.  Discuss snacks, coffee, etc.



February 3 (Mon):The History of Composition Instruction--and a question about its future. (Sharon Crowley, Composition in the University,chapters 1-6.)  Complete the reading before class and type up your annotated bibliography entry and your position paper ready to hand in at the beginning of class.  [Hint: You can use material from your annotation at the beginning of your response paper.].
Presenters:  Tim Esh & Stephanie Dalianis

Additional essays: 

  1. "Teach Writing as a Process not Product," Donald Murray (1972)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 3-6]  Teacher:  Brad Burg
  2. "Writing as a Mode of Learning," Janet Emig (1977)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 7-16]  Teacher:  Nicole Martone


February 10 (Mon):...and a question about its future, continued…(Crowley, chapters 7-12.)   Complete the reading before class and type up your annotated bibliography entry and your position paper ready to hand in at the beginning of class.
Presenters: Kathleen Svendesn  & Nicole Martone

Additional essays:

  1. "The Writer's Audience is Always a Fiction," Walter Ong (1975)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 55-76]  Teacher:  Stephanie Dalianis
  2. "The Language of Exclusion:  Writing Instruction at the University," Mike Rose (1985)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 525-48]  Teacher:  ?????


February 17 (Mon):Another History of Sorts--and the question of ideology. (Lester Faigley, Fragments of Rationality, Chapters 1-3.)   Complete the reading before class and type up your annotated bibliography entry and your position paper ready to hand in at the beginning of class.
Presenters: Amrita Ghosh & Nicole Martone 

Additional essays: 

  1. "Inventing the University," David Bartholomae (1985)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 589-620]  Teacher:  Laura McGinnis
  2. "Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class," James Berlin (1988)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 679-700]  Teacher:  ????


February 24 (Mon):Another History of Sorts, continued… (Faigley, chapters 4, 6-8.)   Complete the reading before class and type up your annotated bibliography entry and your position paper ready to hand in at the beginning of class.
Presenters:   Charity Robertson & Stephanie Dalianis

Additional essays: 

  1. "Consensus and Difference in Collaborative Learning," John Trimbur  (1989)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 439-56]  Teacher:  Kathleen Svendsen
  2. "Considerations for American Freireistas," Victor Villanueva (1991)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 621-38]  Teacher:  Stephanie Dalianis


March 3 (Mon):Contemporary Visions and the story of who we are: "Contemporary Composition: The Major Pedagogical Theories,"  James Berlin (1982)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 233-248] and"Post Process Theory," "Post social epistemic rhetoric," and the politics of separating theory and practice. (Readings from me)
  Complete the reading before class and type up your annotated bibliography entry and your position paper ready to hand in at the beginning of class.
Presenters:   Kevin Huvane (Post Process) & Laura McGinnis (Berlin)

Additional essays: 

  1. "A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing," Linda Flower and John Haynes (1981)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 251-276] Teacher:  Tim Esh
  2. "Is Teaching Still Possible?  Writing, Meaning, and Higher Order Reasoning," Anne Berthoff (1984) [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 307-322]  Teacher:  Katie McKim
  3. "William Perry and Liberal Education," Patricia Bizzell  (1984)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 297-306] Teacher:  Amrita Ghosh
  4. "Composing as a Woman,"  Elizabeth Flynn  (1988)   [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 549-64]  Teacher:  Charity Robertson


March 10 (Mon):Spring Recess! 

March 17 (Mon):Another Vision for the Future--and a retelling of the past:  Goals, outcomes, the definitions of "progressive," and the larger purpose of writing instruction and education in general (Chris Gallagher, Radical Departures.)  Complete the reading before class and type up your annotated bibliography entry and your position paper ready to hand in at the beginning of class.
Presenters:   Katie McKim & [any volunteers??]

Additional essays: 

  1. "Diversity, Ideology, and the Teaching of Writing," Maxine Hairston  (1992)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 659-76]   Teacher:  Katie McKim
  2. "'Contact Zones' and English Studies,"  Patricia Bizzell (1994) [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 735-42]   Teacher:  Kevin Huvane
This week (March 19-22) the Conference on College Composition and Communication holds its annual meeting in NYC.  I strongly urge you to attend at least one day of the conference, both to experience a major academic conference and to see and hear composition scholars in the flesh--many of the people we have read so far will be presenting and attending papers.  There's a copy of the preview at this site <www.ncte.org/convention/cccc2003/> and parts of the conference will also be streaming live at <http://www.ncte.org/cccc/live/> if you can't make it to the City. 

March 24 (Mon):Pedagogy for the 21st Century: Teaching technique and empowering students. (George Hillocks,Ways of Thinking.)  Complete the reading before class and type up yourannotated bibliography entry and your position paper ready to hand in at the beginning of class.
Presenters:   Laura McGinnis & Kathleen Svendsen

Additional essays: 

  1. "Collaborative Learning and the 'Conversation of Mankind'," Kenneth Bruffee  (1984)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 393-414]    Teacher:  Charity Robertson
  2. Discussion of what was interesting, challenging, or otherwise worthy of comment from the CCCC conference last week.   Teacher:  Sandra and any willing contributors!


March31 (Mon): Seeing Yourself as a Teacher I --The first step: thinking about your role as teachers.  (Vila, Life-Affirming Acts.)  Why did you enter the field of literature?  What will you bring to your teaching?  What kind of teacher do you want to be? Complete the reading before class and type up your  annotated bibliography entry and your position paper ready to hand in at the beginning of class.
Presenters:   Tim Esh & Kevin Huvane

Additional essays: 

  1. "Diving In: An Introduction to Basic Writing,"  Mina Shaughnessy (1976)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 289-296]   Teacher:  Nicole Martone
  2. "Cognition, Convention, and Certainty:  What We Need to Know about Writing" Patricia Bizzell (1982)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 365-389]  Teacher:  Brad Burg


April 7 (Mon):Developing theory & practice I--Considering your goals and designing writing assignments. (From Howard & Jamieson, The Bedford Guide, 45-72, 95-116; Chris Anson et al. Scenarios for Teaching Writing, 35-43, 72-73, 75.)  I will provide copies of these readings.
There will be no annotated bibliography this week (aside from those presenting additional essays). The position paper topic is as follows:
    Briefly summarize what you have learned about the writing process. You already have some sense of process theory from our earlier readings, but now it is time to revisit theory and apply it to pedagogy. Should we teach writing as a process? How does revision fit into this system? Look at the example of a staged assignment in the reading from Anson et al. (35-43). Do you think it would be effective? Try to formulate a position about what kinds of comments and suggestions will help student writers. Finally, to exemplify the theory you have developed here, write comments designed to help the authors of "Nineties Racing Challenge" (Scenarios, page 72-3) and "Scheduling my Time" (page 75) revise these pieces. You may suggest that they refer to the Longman Writer's Companion if necessary. Assume that this is the first draft and the finished paper is due in one week. When you have written your comments, summarize briefly how they connect with your paper. (You might find it helpful to imagine the marked up papers as handouts at a conference or workshop.)
Additional essays: 
  1. "Cognitive Development and the Basic Writer,"  Andrea Lunsford (1979)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 277-288]   Teacher:  Kevin Huvane
  2. "Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers,"  Nancy Sommers (1980)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 43-54]  Teacher:  Laura McGinnis
  3. "Audience Addressed/Audience Invoked:  The Role of Audience in Composition Theory and Pedagogy," Lisa Ede and Andrea Lunsford (1984)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 77-96] Teacher:  Tim Esh


April 14 (Mon):  Developing theory & practice II--Responding to writing. (From Anson, Scenarios, 100-46, and 84-87, 66-67; Howard & Jamieson, The Bedford Guide, 76-92 & 208-229.)  I will provide copies of these readings.  Bring The Longman Writer's Companionto class. 
There will be no annotated bibliography this week (aside from those presenting additional essays). The position paper topic is as follows:
    Read the scenario "I Prefer Not To" (pages 84-87 of Scenarios for Teaching Writing). What would you do in that situation? Now read "The Good Family" (page 66-67) and consider the questions following it. Write comments on Nahomae’s paper (use a Xeroxed and enlarged version) so that she could revise it and begin to learn some of the grammatical structures she needs to learn. Finally, write a brief analysis of your response, explaining the position you adopt in regard to writing responses in general and to ESOL and developmental students in particular. You may use Rhea Sorkon’s experience with Binh Cho in your discussion if it seems relevant.
Additional essays: 
  1. "Grammar, Grammars, and the Teaching of Grammar,"  Patrick Hartwell (1985)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 183-212]   Teacher:  Kathleen Svendsen
  2. "Coherence, Cohesion, and Writing Quality," Stephen Witte and Lester Faigley (1981)  [Cross-Talk in Comp Theory, pp 213-232]   Teacher:  Brad Burg


April 21 (Mon):  Drew has decided that this is not really a Monday.  Today, for Drew, is a Friday.  I'll be happy to hold class if you would like (giving us more chance to discuss pedagogy), but you don't have to come!



April 28 (Mon): Developing theory and practice III--The Practicalities of Teaching.  (From Anson et al. Scenarios for Teaching Writing.)  I will provide copies of these readings.  Read pp. 78-79, then read the following scenarios and think about the questions following them:
  • "Chill out Gringo Fool" (82-84)
  • "Young at Heart" (87-88)
  • "A Student Trashes an Office Mate" (88-89)
  • "Coco Feels Raped" (90-91)
  • "Swearing Up and Down" (91)
  • "Collaboration or Collusion?" (92-96)
No annotated bibliography.  The position paper for this week is as follows:
This position paper will be more speculative than the others and is really an opportunity for you to explore your feelings so far. 
  • New teachers:Based on your reaction to these readings, what kinds of problems do you imagine encountering as a first time college writing teacher (or a teacher in another environment)? How will you handle them? Which of the scenarios would you find it most difficult to deal with? Why? What do you learn from this fear? How do the readings we have done and the theories we have discussed so far this semester make you feel about teaching? What general pitfalls do you imagine? What delights? What makes you the most nervous? What makes you the most excited? Consider all of these questions and answer whichever ones you feel like answering!

  • Experienced teachers: To what extent do these readings reflect your experiences? What kinds of problems did you encounter as a first time writing teacher? How did you handle them? Which of the scenarios would you find it most difficult to deal with? Why? What do you learn from this fear? What advice would you give to those experiencing them? How do the readings we have done and the theories we have discussed so far this semester make you feel about your teaching experience? What general pitfalls do you imagine as you plan your classes every day? What delights? What makes you the most nervous? What makes you the most excited? Consider all of these questions and answer whichever ones you feel like answering!



May 5 (Mon):Last class--Developing theory and practice IV:  Planning courses, designing syllabi, and evaluating textbooks. Share and discuss your syllabi ideas with your fellow students and evaluate textbooks and handbooks.  A brief discussion of the final portfiolo, response paper #12, and due dates. 

Finally, you get to evaluate the course and tell me what I should do next time I teach it!

Contact me  |  My webpage  |  Drew Composition Program  |  English Dept  |  Caspersen Graduate School
.

Last updated, March 29, 2003
Sandra Jamieson
Drew University, Madison NJ 07940..............................................................