Home
About
the Course
Students
Research
Topics
Interviews
|
|
| Professors
> Artist, Scientist,
Other; Other Interviews > Index |
| |
| Artist |
| Professor
Gerry Guest |
Art
Historian with a main emphasis on the European Middle Ages |
| Hobbies/Interests:
Music, Opera, Museums, Reading (novels), Movies. |
1. How would
you define science?
“My stereotypical view of
science is an attempt to find some rational and objective way to answer
questions about the universe in a way that would find truth. But then,
you have to define truth and that is not too easy. ‘Objectivity is the
key to science’ – but I really don’t believe that.”
How would you define
art?
“That is a good question
in that art doesn’t have a working definition. The more you study
art, the more you include as art. So it becomes almost impossible
to define. The traditional definitions of art are so unsatisfying.
One pithy quote I recently read, ‘Art is anything more beautiful than it
has to be.’ But there, you have to define beauty, and many artists
would say that their work doesn’t concern itself with beauty.”
Summary
of all answers to question 1
2. What drew you towards
art?
“A bizarre academic path.
In high school, math was my biggest subject. Math was always a comfortable
thing, just problem solving – finding the definite solution. In college,
I was an engineering major for two years. Then, I just did not like the
academic program. I went on to be a math major, but found that I really
did not like the fact that many of the professors there seemed to keep
to themselves. . . I did not want that. I started taking some art history
classes my junior year, but it was too late to change my major. I graduated
with a B.A. in Mathematics. So I studied art history in graduate school.
I have always liked art and cultural things, music, art, theater.”
Why do you think scientists
are drawn to their field?
“It depends on the kind
of science. I would guess some are drawn by the problem solving aspects.
You can discover or invent something beneficial. I imagine that the problem
solving or a curiosity about the world out there, what do atoms and molecules
look like, how is life sustained? The physical world is so complicated;
it is natural to want to understand it.”
Summary
of all answers to question 2
3. What do you
aim to accomplish in art?
“Vaguely, I just want (in teaching) to raise people’s awareness of this
incredibly visual world we live in. We internalize images, and they have
a profound effect on us both consciously and unconsciously.”
“Also, you just want students to enjoy and understand art. We get pleasure
by looking at beautiful things. We want that for them, too. To lose the
intimidation of the museum.
“Also, to enjoy and appreciate history. In the modern age, it has become
disregarded. When the modern breaks away from the past, we tend to forget
it. I want people to be more aware of the importance of history.”
What do you think scientists
aim to accomplish?
“Well, my psychology friends
are caught in a modernist paradigm that what we know can be improved. The
knowledge can be bettered. Art is in more personal terms, that is, as the
art ages, each generation sees it differently. Scientific ideas don’t always
age well, but great art continues to fascinate (and often for new reasons).”
Summary
of all answers to question 3
4. Do you think what you
do is creative? If so, how? If not,
why?
“Yes. When writing about
art you have to be creative. Forty to fifty years ago, many art historians
would say their own creativity was not an issue, the facts and the right
answers were important. Now in the Humanities individual issues and concerns
are brought to the front. When you write, you have to be creative, but
also accurate to history. There are some questions without answers, and
there is creativity in interpreting them.”
Do you think science
is creative? If so, how? If not, why?
“Probably it is. People
who make original advancements in science are creative by re-thinking and
imagining problems in ways that other people may not have ever thought.”
Summary
of all answers to question 4
5. To what degree do emotions
play a role in your work if at all?
“In the basic sense, there
is an emotional component in my work. As an art historian, you tend to
work on things you like. I guess you have to work on things that give you
pleasure, and then you develop feelings of affection and attachment to
works. That is probably the one important way emotions come into my field
of study.”
To what degree do you
think emotions play a role in science?
“The simple minded view
is that they do not. One can become emotional about theories and ideas,
I am sure there is a fair amount of that. We tend to think scientists are
driven by battling for dominance. Scientists’ emotions are charged by their
hypotheses.”
Summary
of all answers to question 5
6. What is beauty?
“I guess there are many
different kind of beauty. For example, in visual art, beauty just stops
you and you forget yourself for a moment. Or even the opposite in a way
-- you can feel extra alive or extra human. But other types of beauty exist,
too. There is a really spiritual kind of human beauty, like you see in
a person you love. In art, it is almost impossible to define. It is what
gives you pleasure, and that is hard to define, too. In the end, the history
of art tells us that every era and every artist has a different concept
of beauty.”
Do you find beauty
in science?
“Yes, in certain respects.
There is a kind of inhuman beauty to the order of the universe, and a beauty
in our ability to see it more clearly thanks to science.”
Summary
of all answers to question 6
7. Do you think art and
science are related? If so, how? If not, why?
“My naive answer would be
that I think of them as separate. Two different ways of thinking and looking
at the world.”
Summary
of all answers to question 7
9. When you are observing
nature, what thoughts come to mind?
“Sometimes one does think
or art when looking at nature, the landscapes, trees, clouds remind me
of works of art, a ‘Renoir Sky.’ I don’t think of the world that scientifically.
I am always trying to look at things more carefully through drawing. Like
a tree, every visual aspect of it I look at. In an unscientific way, I
want to know how it looks, what it is, but not what is going on at a scientific
level. I want to know the visual. Nature is among the most complicated
things.”
Summary
of all answers to question 9
10. What do you
consider success in your field?
“I define it in an audience
centered way. If a number of my students come away liking art and want
to look at more art, interested in learning more about art. In a more scholarly
way, I would like to write one or two really good books which are creative,
interesting, and useful for the history of art and visual culture.”
Summary
of all answers to question 10
Top
of Page
|
| Scientist |
| Professor
Robert Fenstermacher |
Teaching
Undergraduate Physics at Drew University. Earlier, Radio Astronomy, Astronomy,
and particle-solid interactions. |
| Hobbies/Interests:
Cars, tennis, audio equipment (sound systems), music, home improvement. |
1. How would
you define science?
“I would define science
as the process by which we investigate nature and the world around us.
It’s done in an attempt to find truth concerning the ‘laws’ of nature,
and includes how the world works.”
How would you define
art?
“I believe art is a creative
expression of one’s spiritual nature, and see this especially in the field
of music.”
Summary
of all answers to question 1
2. What drew you
towards science?
“I’ve always liked to know
how things worked. When I was young, I used to take things apart to find
out how they ‘ticked.’ In high school physics, it all just ‘clicked,’ and
it was all very interesting. It was basically logical thinking and reasoning,
things that came relatively easy to me.”
Why do you think artists
are drawn to their field?
“Artists have a more intuitive
nature and ‘feel’ things differently. With less emphasis on linear thinking,
they focus more on creative spirit. It is not true that artists are more
creative than scientists. They just feel things more, and are not drawn
so much to the logical (how things work) world, which lets them be more
creative in their intuitive nature.”
Summary
of all answers to question 2
3. What do you aim
to accomplish in science?
“To learn something fundamental
about the world around us, and to get one step closer to the final conclusion
of ‘how things work.’ Fitting the puzzle together. Also, formulating laws
from observation or understanding a substance’s properties or structure.
Ultimately to understand how nature is put together, and to find the truth.”
What do you think artists
aim to accomplish?
“I think they have a more
human to human connection. They show feelings in their work and aim to
convey those expressions through their creativity. They also aim to obtain
feedback via other’s opinions.”
Summary
of all answers to question 3
4. Do you think
what you do is creative? If so, how? If not,
why?
“Yes. Nature is very clever
in hiding the secrets of the world. In order to find them, one must be
very creative. Creativity is used for the technique of discovery. You can
not just go outside and say, ‘Tell me!’ Also, when obtaining data, creativity
is used in the interpretation of the data, deciding what it all means.
Some people can see patterns and what all the numbers mean – it is imaginative,
like in art.”
Do you think art is creative?
If so, how? If not, why?
“Yes, totally. The art is
coming out of a person, it is a product of their own being, an expression
of the spirituality and feelings they have about their universe. Scientists
are looked at as cold, while artists are warm. This is not totally true.
It is just the training, and expression differences. Artists express, sciences
don’t so much.”
Summary
of all answers to question 4
5. To what degree
do emotions play a role in your work if at all?
“Emotions should not play
a major role in science, just cold logical analysis. But scientists are
people with egos, show competitiveness. They want to be right, and are
excited when everything does work out. They do show emotions . .the ‘motivation
emotions.’ In general, though scientists are just highly focused, and don’t
express their feelings as part of their work. But artists are focused too.
Expressing their emotions is more a part of their product.”
To what degree do you
think emotions play a role in art/?
(Answered in previous responses)
Summary
of all answers to question 5
6. What is beauty?
“My first response would
be an ascetic quality, things that are pleasing to the eye, or spirit.
But a lot of things are beautiful – understanding a concept, and symmetry.
A lot of subjective things, based upon what you were taught and what your
family considers beautiful are likely to influence what you think has beauty.”
Do you find beauty in
art?
“Sure. No work is ugly to
me, but I might find it ‘strange’ if no connection or feelings have been
transmitted. Some things just don’t speak to me.”
Do you find beauty in
science?
“Yes. The intricacies of
understanding. . .how it fits together like a puzzle. It is amazing how
things are connected, and finding those connections is beautiful. The beauty
in finding that last piece of the puzzle.” A fine machine can be beautiful,
even a work of art. . . the creativity of the design and the mechanical
aspects of it show beauty.”
Summary
of all answers to question 6
7. Do you think
art and science are related? If so, how? If not, why?
“I don’t know. There is
probably a continuum from linear (scientific) to intuitive (art) though,
and many people who bridge that gap. But there is the ‘Art’ of something.
When there is something you cannot write a procedure for, and list exactly
how to do it. Like someone making scientific crystals. Some people just
cannot do it, but others know . . . when this looks like this, put about
this much in, and wait about oh . . . this long. Art and creativity all
go together. There is an overlap from that point of view. There are artists
who have done science, and there are scientists who do art, but art and
science are separated in the world, and are two stereotypical ends to the
spectrum. One example of an overlap is that artist using the science of
high technology to produce his or her art.”
Summary
of all answers to question 7
8. Which do you
think plays a greater role: science in art or art in science?
“I suppose that art has
a larger role in science because art helps science more than the other
way around. Many great scientists were amateur artists. For example, Einstein
played the violin with fellow scientists.”
Summary
of all answers to question 8
9. When you are
observing nature, what thoughts come to mind?
“That it is very complicated.
Nature is clever by hiding its secrets. It is fascinating how things are
connected. Those in the humanities look at nature with spiritual thoughts
and feelings, scientists look for the logical connections. When I listen
to music, I hear the quality of the sound, ‘Is this good, or is (the sound)
distorted?’ Someone into music (for emotions) would listen to a broken,
scratched record and can detect good music out of it. I am distracted by
its distortions.”
Summary
of all answers to question 9
10. What do you
consider success in your field?
“As a teacher at Drew, I
look at success as measured by how well my students do . . . this number
to grad school, this number to internships, how successful a student lab
experiment went, and if all the students understood it. As a scientist,
its making discoveries, and getting one step closer to understanding nature
and the universe. A number of meaningful discoveries is important personally,
while the number of published works is probably more important to the boss
at the institution. The hard part is combining the two – teaching and being
in the lab, finding the best of both worlds.”
Summary
of all answers to question 10
Top
of page
|
| Other Discipline |
| Professor
Joseph Romance |
Political
Science with a main emphasis on American Politics. |
| Hobbies/Interests:
Golf, Bridge, Running. |
1.
How would you define science?
“Science is the search for
understanding of the empirical world. It’s an effort to provide questions
and answers, based on rational thought and neutral observation.”
How would you define
art?
“Either the making of a
product or the product itself created out of the human imagination.
Often, but not necessarily, it’s tied to beauty.”
Summary
of all answers to question 1
2. Why do you think
scientists are drawn to their field?
“I honestly don’t know.
The same things as artists, I suppose, with a more rigorous will to obey
the world more than their own imaginations.”
Why do you think artists
are drawn to their field?
“In the contemporary world,
probably a strong individual creative will. I don’t think it’s always
been like that; in ancient times, it was probably more in terms of craft.
Today, a cathedral is art, but it is the work of individual craftsmen.
Also, a recording of a Mass from that time would be art today, but not
to them back then”
Summary
of all answers to question 2
3. What do you think
scientists aim to accomplish?
“To reveal the truth.”
What do you think artists
aim to accomplish?
“To produce the beautiful.”
Summary
of all answers to question 3
4. Do you think
science is creative? If so, how? If not, why?
“Yes. Any time you
use the human mind to observe and reason new things, that is a creative
process. Explaining what scientists have found in the empirical world
requires creativity in using language.”
Do you think art is creative?
If so, how? If not, why?
“Yes, they are using their
imaginations to produce things, which is the creative process. Even
if I dislike them, I still consider them creative. But not all art’s
like that; if an artist is producing something that’s been done before,
then it’s not creative, just redundant. But the successful ones are
creative.”
Summary
of all answers to question 4
5. To what degree
do you think emotions play a role in art?
“They play a great role
in everyone’s life. I don’t think it’s a very important part of the
process, but they’re human beings, so there’s going to be some kind of
emotion involved.”
To what degree do you
think emotions play a role in science?
“They play a partial role,
I suppose. They could be tapping into their emotions when they produce
things, though I don’t think it’s necessary. Someone can produce
a craft like a building, which is something I consider art, but it is emotionally
unattached.”
Summary
of all answers to question 5
6. What is beauty?
“Beauty is truth and goodness.”
Do you find beauty in
art?
“Yes. I think that’s
self-explanatory.”
Do you find beauty in
science?
“No. What scientists
are studying may be beautiful, and the scientist may be a beautiful person,
but the processes they use aren’t really beautiful or ugly.”
Summary
of all answers to question 6
7. Do you think
art and science are related? If so, how? If not, why?
“Yes. They both search
for truth. Art searches for it via illumination within the human
soul, science searches for it via explorations outside the soul.
The only difference would be that art causes a person to reevaluate him/herself
-- it betters us. But the scientific process does not help us.
The outcome may be good or bad.”
Summary
of all answers to question 7
8. Which do you
think plays a greater role: science in art or art in science?
“I would suspect that they
both play an equal role in each other. The artistic image can influence
science and how the science is done. Likewise, a work of art can
be influential for science in both what the artist produces and the process
of making it.”
Summary
of all answers to question 8
9. When you are
observing nature, what thoughts come to mind?
“God. Life.
Uncivilized.”
Summary
of all answers to question 9
10. What do you
consider success in your field?
“The discovery and recognition
of regular and specific patterns in nature.”
“The production of the beautiful,
that which illuminates the good and the truthful.”
Summary
of all answers to question 10
Top
of page
|
|